- WHY ARE SO MANY CPU GAMES NOT FOR MAC? FOR ANDROID
- WHY ARE SO MANY CPU GAMES NOT FOR MAC? ANDROID
- WHY ARE SO MANY CPU GAMES NOT FOR MAC? SOFTWARE
- WHY ARE SO MANY CPU GAMES NOT FOR MAC? FREE
- WHY ARE SO MANY CPU GAMES NOT FOR MAC? MAC
It tends to be a two-pronged thing: first, the perception that Android users are less likely to spend money on or in apps, and second, the belief that paid apps in particular suffer from crippling levels of piracy on Android. What? When developers are slow to support Android, it's often not just about the money and time they'll spend getting there – it's concern about the money they'll make once on the platform. But that may not make the wait for some apps less frustrating.ĭeveloper concerns about profits and piracy You could argue that these developers are making more of an effort to serve Android users, not less. That said, many developers still prefer to launch on iOS, iterate their app over a couple of updates in response to feedback from their users, then tackle Android – with extra time for testing to ensure the app works well, and has Android-specific features (widgets, for example). If they're upfront with users about which phones and tablets their app will work on, the support queries aspect becomes less daunting too. Improved development tools are making porting easier, and there's more data ( including Google's own) to help developers decide which Android devices to focus their energies on first. Is this fair? Fragmentation, as it's called, may not be solved, but it's become a more-manageable problem – and thus a less-convincing excuse for avoiding Android altogether.
WHY ARE SO MANY CPU GAMES NOT FOR MAC? FOR ANDROID
Many developers' lack of enthusiasm for Android is down to concerns not just about the costs of making and testing their apps for it, but also the resources required to support them once they're launched, if emails flood in about unspotted bugs on particular models.
WHY ARE SO MANY CPU GAMES NOT FOR MAC? SOFTWARE
On Android, it's a different story: nearly 12,000 different devices out there in the hands of people, with a wider range of screen sizes, processors and versions of the Android software still in use. What? Developing iOS apps means ensuring they work nicely on a small range of iPhones and/or iPads: generally 6-8 different devices depending how far back the developer wants to go.
So what's going on? If you're one of the millions of new Android users wondering why you can't get some of the apps your Apple-owning friends can, here are some of the reasons, analysis of whether they're fair, and some optimistic thoughts on why this may change.ĭeveloper concerns about costs and complexity
WHY ARE SO MANY CPU GAMES NOT FOR MAC? FREE
This week, yet another research firm, Canalys, fuelled the flames of this debate by pointing out that 30% of the 50 top paid and 50 top free iPad apps aren't also available on Android – although 11 of the 30 un-ported apps were made by Apple, so their Android-less status is hardly a surprise. Mailbox and Tweetbot are still no-shows, and while much-praised children's app-maker Toca Boca has 18 apps available on iOS, only one of them is also on Android. Nike's Nike+ FuelBand still hasn't made the leap. Instagram launched on Android 18 months after iOS. Zombies 2, Clash of Clans and Worms 3, but Android owners can't. Right now, if you own an iOS device, you can play Plants vs. Yet a lot of apps still come out for Apple's iOS first or even exclusively. Meanwhile, Google says that more than 1.5m new Android devices are being activated every day, it's nearing 1bn activated in total so far, and that by the end of this year that total will include more than 70m Android tablets.īig. According to research firm Gartner, 79% of all smartphones sold between April and June this year were running Android: 177.9m handsets compared to Apple's 31.9m iPhones.Īnother research firm, IDC, estimates that 62.6% of tablets that shipped to retailers between April and June were running Android: 28.2m devices versus 14.6m iPads.
WHY ARE SO MANY CPU GAMES NOT FOR MAC? MAC
I don't think that most people will keep their Mac for a decade, but the fact that my vintage iMac still runs without any hitches is enough of a reason for me to continually recommend people seriously consider the platform.Android is big. Great-looking and -feeling hardware, consistently updated software, free in-person tech support, and inter-device connectivity all come at a cost. There's no getting around the fact that buying a Mac is expensive, but it's easier to justify the price of one when you think about what you're getting. Knowing what you're getting makes the price of a Mac easier to justify.
After using a Mac, most PCs feel a little clunky, or at the very least not as well put together. This is the strongest material case in the "you get what you pay for" argument, so it shouldn't be overlooked. I'm not saying I agree with every decision the company has made, or that there aren't nicely designed PCs out there, but it's hard to argue that Macs don't look and feel great. Function will always be more important than form, but it is nice that Apple takes the time to carefully design its computers.
0 kommentar(er)
